The forehand is one of the most important hit of tennis
field. Along with the serve, forehand from the construction that happens almost
every point of the professional players.
To have a good forehand, foremost we must wield the racquet
properly. Currently, there are three different types of grip to perform the
forehand. Each has its qualities and its defects. In this article, I will
comment on the three types of forehand grip and the strengths and weaknesses of
each of them.
Previously, all players used the Continental grip to
perform the forehand. Over the years, due to the evolution of materials and
research in biomechanics, the way to hold the racket was changing. Currently
there are three types of grip for the forehand ground, namely:
ü Eastern: The Eastern grip is shown in Figure 1. To understand how to handle
it just place the right palm on the strings of the racket and slide it toward
the cable, closing it on him
ü Semi-Western: The Semi-Western grip is shown in Figure 2. To understand how to hold it,
break footprint Eastern, turn right hand to the right, making the palm rest on
the wide face of the cable racket ( face 4 )
ü Western: The Western grip is shown in Figure 3. There are three ways to check
out this footprint. Make sure the "V" of the hand is between two and
four out of the racket face. See, also, if the bone window is between four and
five face. Finally, make sure the ropes are fully pralelas racket to the ground.
Note: The Continental grip is used when the forehand slice is performed.
Figure 1 Figure 2 Figure 3
From the description of the three handles, we can
mention the main strengths and weaknesses of each about the height of the
contact point on the distance of the hit relative to your body and the amount
of effect generated. We examine these separately below.
Distance and height of the contact point
The point
of contact between the racket and the ball changes according to the hilt. The
point of contact with the Eastern grip is more along the body. Those who use
the Semi-Western grip, the point of contact must be made a little more ahead.
Finally, those who use the Western grip, the point of contact with the ball are
more forward. Thinking that aspect, players who use the Eastern grip has more
time to hit the ball when compared with those who hold the racket with the
Semi-Western grip and mostly Western.
The height of the racket during the contact point
between the paddle and the ball is also influenced by the hilt. The height of
the racket is lower for those who use the Eastern grip. For those who use the
Semi-Western grip, the height of the racket is higher. Have the players, who
wield the racquet with the Western, the height of the racket during the contact
point is even higher. In this context, players who use the Eastern grip have an
easier time low bounce balls and more difficult to counter high balls. For
players who wield the racquet with Western, they are better able to bounce high
balls and more difficult to counter low balls. Thus, those who hold the racket
with Western grip and flex your knees need to get a good base ball bat.
As we can see, a relationship between the distance and
height of the contact point. As the contact ball/racket is more forward, your
arm will automatically get higher, and therefore the height of the contact
point will also be higher.
Generated effect
Players who
hold to the Western grip can generate much throttle on the handle with relative
ease. This happens by itself in the characteristic footprint of the racket.
This acceleration causes players who use the Western grip generate a lot of
topspin on the ball effect when compared with those who hold to the Eastern
grip.
Even with all these positive and negative comments
pertaining to the hilt, I think the ideal for the forehand grip is that which
one feels most comfortable. The main point is to avoid the extreme grips, which
are Continental and Western, especially in the initial learning. As is
happening to the evolution of the player can be made to exchange grip,
according to the need and desire of the player.
More
information:
Email:
jefferson.jcc@hotmail.com
References
1.
Treuherz
RF , A. Cornejo Shoes: techniques and tactics of play: strategic , mental ,
physical , nutritional preparation. 2006
Nenhum comentário:
Postar um comentário
Deixe o seu comentário.